Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

 

Knowledge means everything in today's world, and these days, a few individuals say that we have to share scientific, business and study-related knowledge that would benefit society. However, opposers think this may lead to serious trouble since some confidential data may be leaked. Hence, this essay will discuss both schools of thought with suitable judgement. 

On the one hand, by sharing data, this society may stay updated due to the fact people will be able to grab novel opportunities. This concept will instil new ideas in the individuals, and they may be able to start their businesses and go for more jobs. Moreover, by sharing scientific knowledge, we can get wonderful outcomes since the whole team can be aware of increased data circulation within the scientific community by encouraging better transparency and enabling the reproducibility of excellent results. Furthermore, scholars doing research work prefer to publish their academic and scientific work in international publishing houses like Elsevier and Springer to share knowledge with juniors and other people around the globe. Besides, business knowledge also holds water as it opens doors to success for employers and employees. It ensures more employees are involved with information outside of their departments, and they can communicate easily with others. 

On the other hand, this knowledge sharing may have disastrous consequences too, since the information leakage may impose a number of security and emotional threats. The primary disadvantage of knowledge sharing will lead to security infringement. To be more precise, by sharing scientific knowledge with a nation about developments, another country may reap benefits easily. It happens when one nation opens access to its research work and the second nation has to focus on future outcomes only. Hence, the first nation lacks. The secondary downside of this concept is that if one company gives knowledge to another about business, another company may attain success easily. For instance, Apple invests 17% of its revenue in innovation every year, owing to which they gravitate millions of users. On the contrary, if they share their research knowledge with competitors, they will indeed lag. 

After this discussion, I am of the opinion that knowledge sharing must be restricted up to a certain extent. For instance, one company can share research work with others during the Covid-19 situation to save people's lives. 

To conclude, both factors have advantages and disadvantages, especially in the case of science and trade. As a result, it varies from person to person whether they wish to share data or not.