Some people believe that free housing should be provided by governments for underprivileged people who can't afford to buy a house. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give an example based on your own experience.
Some people believe that free housing should be provided by governments for underprivileged people who can't afford to buy a house. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give an example based on your own experience.
In the modern era, the house plays a prominent role in everyone's life. A few individuals assert that free housing ought to be provided by the authorities for deprived people who cannot afford to purchase a house. I partially agree with this notion and will discuss this notion with appropriate examples in the forthcoming paragraphs.
On the one hand, scores of aspects aggravate this phenomenon. The significant reason is human rights. To be more precise, Housing is a fundamental human need, and governments have a responsibility to ensure access to affordable housing. A few needy people have no house or money. They suffer several troubles in the summer and rainy season. Free housing can help alleviate poverty and improve living standards. Thus, the free housing concept plays an essential role in people's lives.
On the other hand, several demerits will support my viewpoint. The foremost reason is the economic burden. To be more precise, Free housing can be costly and strain government resources. People depend on the government. They do not participate in work. To cite an example, the government survey reveals that 75% of poor individuals do not have a house, and the authority provides a house; nonetheless, these individuals do not live in a house. This house gives rent to individuals, and they can earn money from this house. Needy individuals resort to utilising to earn money. Governments might need to prioritise sustainable solutions, such as affordable housing initiatives or subsidies. Hence,
In my opinion, apart from the need for affordable housing, I believe that governments should prioritise sustainable solutions, such as offering subsidies or financial assistance for low-income individuals, along with implementing programs to increase affordable housing options. The chair should be helpful to needy people; however, it should not provide a house or other items for free. The authority provides skills courses. Deprived people do their work by hand. Providing knowledge about repairing, technical, plumbing and electrical, they can easily earn money. This is the best way to fulfil needs and dreams.
To conclude, after discussing both schools of thought, I firmly assert that governments should prioritise sustainable solutions to address housing affordability, rather than solely relying on free housing.