BAWA IELTS & PTE - Ferozepur

  E-mail has had a huge impact on professional and social communication, but this impact has been both negative and positive. Do the disadvantages of using e-mail outweigh the advantages? With the advent of technology, people prefer using electronic mail to transfer information in their professional and social lives, which has both advantages and disadvantages. Thus, this essay attempts to discuss whether the demerits outweigh the merits.  On the one hand, emails have made our professional and social communication swifter and convenient owing to a plethora of reasons.  The foremos t is that one can share information using emails from one sphere of the world to another in a matter of time at no additional cost. Moreover, banks and the corporate sectors send monthly statements and official letters to their clients and employees, respectively, using email since it is secure and quicker. Therefore, companies can save their extra money on paper usage, too.  Another benefi...

  Many individuals believe that taking regular health check-ups is unnecessary if they feel healthy. Do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint? Explain your answer. Essay Written By - Manvi Manchanda. It covers 7.0 Bands in Idea. It is a contentious issue that frequent health check-ups are unneeded if an individual feels healthy. I strongly condemn the mentioned notion since a plethora of diseases take time to show symptoms. The primary reason  sustaining  my viewpoint is that regular  check-ups  provide an overall health status.  To be more precise, periodic healthcare visits mitigate the probability of incurable diseases such as Obesity, Cancer and Liver Cirrhosis significantly. Moreover, people between the ages of 30 and 40 are often seen  succumbing  to cardiac arrest despite a healthy lifestyle. Additionally, minor deficiencies of vitamins and minerals that can give rise to serious issues are detected at early stages and cured beforehand. ...

  Some people argue that we should do research into our family history. Others agree that we should focus on the present and future generations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. It is a contentious issue whether we focus on researching family history or we must emphasise the present and future generations. Thus, this essay will address both schools of thought with a suitable judgment.  On the one hand, finding family history is imperative in our lives. The primary is building family connections. Researching genealogy can make a great family activity, involving siblings, children, and grandchildren. It can bring family members together around a shared interest and also inspire intergenerational storytelling and sharing. Similarly, learning about common ancestors has a way of opening up doors of communication. Sometimes, research will even end up reconnecting long-lost relatives in surprising ways. Another benefit is associated with social matters. To be more ...

  Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore, every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Water plays a crucial role in our lives, as we cannot survive without it. It is, therefore, said that the authorities must provide water free of charge to people. I partially agree with the statement because it is a basic necessity for survival; however, there must be some charges to discourage people from using water unnecessarily.   On the one hand, water is a human right, and everyone has a right to have proper access to it. Water is vital not only for drinking but also for other purposes such as cooking, washing clothes, and sanitation. If people do not use water or governments restrict water usage, they may fall ill. It is owing to the fact people will be unable to maintain proper hygiene, and various diseases such as cholera and typhoid may gulp them. Similarly, in many isolated areas around the globe, ...

  Many people are opting for several careers as compared to a single career to earn more money. To what extent do you agree or disagree? A number of individuals opt for different careers rather than focusing on one career to mint more profits. I agree with the notion because it is the best way to withstand unforeseen circumstances.  The foremost benefit of this thinking is associated with skill diversification. Choosing different careers can lead to increased flexibility, diverse skill development, and potentially higher job satisfaction. This concept allows individuals to explore different industries, adapt to changing circumstances, and find roles that truly align with their evolving interests and strengths. Moreover, by exploring different careers, individuals can identify high-demand fields and potentially find roles with better compensation and benefits which lead to greater financial stability and improved life's quality.  Another benefit of having different earning...

  Nuclear power is a significant source of electricity generation in various advanced nations; however, a few people assert we must forbid it and focus on alternative renewable resources. I agree with the statement to a certain extent since nuclear power has several advantages.  Nuclear is one of the cleanest sources of energy and generates electricity by emitting the same gases compared to renewables. Nuclear also requires substantially less land than wind and solar. Moreover, nuclear plants keep churning out energy even when the wind is not blowing and the sun is not shining. It has been a proven fact that nuclear power generates four times fewer greenhouse gases than solar. Hence, I think nuclear power has several merits. Conversely, one section of society claims the authorities must use solar or hydropower instead of nuclear because they are less dangerous than nuclear. We cannot forget an incident that happened around 40 years ago namely the Chernobyl nuclear accident. It...